After exploring the language of symmetry, which I wrote about in my previous post, I started trying to figure out a straightforward way to teach this symmetry to the children that I will be meeting with next month. I’ve spent many hours over many days, creating all sorts of pattern templates, page templates, drawings, designs and cut-outs with the goal of presenting something clear, inspiring and doable. It’s not working out. It’s time to give up. I have a big envelope that everything is going into.
I’m surprised. It seemed to be going well. I figured out, for instance, that the best way to make a strip with vertical symmetry was to make an accordion, which easy to fold, especially if I make copies using the patterned paper shown above.
Still, after days of working out systems and designs, I didn’t have that feeling that I get when I know I’ve gotten it right.
It’s a disappointment, to say that least, to acknowledge that I need to just stop and put this all aside. I’ve been at the place before: It doesn’t scare me anymore, it’s just that I was so excited about how things seemed to be working out. I’m perplexed that I’m not ending up where I wanted to be.
Now, hours later, I’m sorting out what’s missing.
What I’m missing is the input of the students. The way that I really learn to teach something is to actually teach it. I watch how students react to what I’m explaining, I watch the work that they do, listen to the questions they ask, learn where my teaching is lacking through the “mistakes” that they make. I’m in this isolated vacuum now. To make this lesson vibrant, to make it snap, I need the students. So, that’s it. Everything is in the envelope. To be continued, after adding students….
News Flash: A Codified Language Exists to Describe Patterns. I’ve been so excited to discover the way to speak about patterns.
I’ve been teaching decorative techniques for a long time now. I’ve started trying to use more precise terminology in my teaching, and I suspected there was more to know. I started out looking at artistic and graphic design sites, really I did. I looked on lynda.com, I looked on youtube, and poked around the internet in general. Then Maria Droujkova pointed me in the direction of something called Wallpaper Groups, and guess what, I landed on sites that described pattern making with precision, using the language of mathematics.
The more I learn the more I understand that what math does is enhance the way that people can describe what’s in the world. It appears that hundreds of years ago mathematicians figured out how to understand and talk about patterns.
This summer I’ll be teaching a week’s worth of classes to young children at our community center. I enjoy showing students decorative techniques, so my immediate interest has been to develop a modest curriculum that focuses on making books that are embellished with style. Even though many of the students will be at an age where they are still struggling with concepts such as “next to” and “underneath” I hope to introduce them to ways of thinking about concepts of transformation.
Strip Symmetry is where I landed when I was surfing for a way to find words to describe the kind decorations I’ve been thinking about. In other words, the patterns I am looking to teach will have a linear quality in the way that they occupy a space, as opposed to being like a central starburst, or an all-over wallpaper pattern. It turns out that there are only a handful of words that are used to describe every single repeating linear pattern ever made.
A Translation takes a motif and repeats it exactly.
Vertical Refectionmirrors a motif across an imaginary vertical line. The name of this particular transformation confused me at first, as the design itself extends in a horizontal direction, but once I prioritized the idea of the vertical mirror, it made more sense.
Glide Reflection can be described as sliding then flipping the motif,, but that description sounds confusing to me. Instead, understand glide reflection by looking at the pattern we make with our feet when we walk; Our feet are mirror images of each other, and they land in an alternating pattern on the ground. Imagine footsteps on top of each of the paper turtles you might better be able to isolate the glide refection symmetry.
Horizontal Reflection mirrors the design across an imaginary horizontal line.
Here’s a translation that shifts horizontally, but there’s no such thing as a strip symmetry that translates top to bottom. Instead, convention dictates that the viewer turns the pattern so that it moves from left to right.
Rotation rotates a design around an equator. The pattern above, as well as the first image of this post, I had considered these both to be rotatation( ( I imagined the equator drawn across the middle of the page), especially if it’s 7 year-olds that I am talking to, but close inspection reveals more. To highlight that I am presenting these concepts with broad strokes, here is what Professor Darrah Chavey wrote about the image above (the one with the leaves) when I asked for his input:
“As to this particular pattern, there’s a slight problem in viewing these leaves as a strip pattern. The leaves you show are made from a common template, but that template isn’t quite symmetric, and the way the leaves are repeated across the top isn’t quite regular. For example, the stem of the maple leaf in the top row, #1, leans a little to the left, and has a bigger bulge on the left. If we view this as a significant variation, then the maple leaves on the top row go: Left, Right, Left, Left, Right, Right, which isn’t a regular pattern, i.e. it doesn’t have a translation. On the other hand, if we view those differences as being too small to worry about, then the leaves themselves have a vertical reflection, successive pairs of leaves have vertical reflections between them, and the strip pattern on the top is of type pm11. The bottom strip is a rotation of the top strip, but if we view those differences as significant, then it still isn’t a strip pattern (it would be a central symmetry of type D1), and if we view those differences as insignificant, then it would be a pattern of type pmm2, since it would have both vertical reflections, and rotations (and consequently also have horizontal reflections).”
I was excited to get this response to the leaves image, as it reminded me that my newly acquired understanding of symmetries, though useful, is simply just emerging.
So that’s it:
Reflection (horizontal or vertical)
Darrah Chavey, who is a professor at Beloit college, turned out to be the hero in this journey of mine, for having made and posted videos on youtube. Here’s a link to one of his many lectures on patterns: Ethnomathematics Lecture 3: Strip Symmetries
Now here’s some nuts-&-bolts of what I’ve learned from making the samples that I’ve posted here:
the book I made was too small (only 5.5″ high) because the cut papers then had to be too small to handle easily. I’m thinking that any book I make with students needs each page to be at least 8.5″ tall.
It was easier to create harmonious looking patterns when I started out with domino rectangles (rectangles that have a 2:1 height to width ratio), then cut them in half and half again to make squares, tilted squares,triangles and rectangles.
I like the look of alternating plain paper and cubed paper. Folding paper that has cubes printed on just one side accomplishes this.
I am going to enjoy teaching these college level concepts to young elementary children.